Microservices architecture has gained popularity recently as a technique for creating sophisticated and scalable software systems. Microservices are scalable, independently deployable services that talk to one another across a network.
Making it easier for these services to communicate with one another is one of the major problems with a microservices design. HTTP and messaging are two popular methods for microservices communication.
The common protocol used for communication between web servers and clients is called HTTP (Hypertext Transfer Protocol). HTTP is frequently utilized as a means of communication between services in a microservices architecture.
On the other side, messaging involves the exchange of messages between services utilizing a messaging system such as RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, or Amazon SQS.
The decision between HTTP and messaging depends on a number of variables, including the particular use case, scalability requirements, and system complexity. Both protocols have advantages and disadvantages. Understanding the benefits and drawbacks of each strategy is crucial in this situation to choose the best course of action.
For microservices communication, this article will examine the distinctions between HTTP and messaging and give a general overview of the trade-offs involved with each strategy.
Communication Using HTTP
HTTP is the World Wide Web’s basis and is extensively used for communication between web browsers and servers. In recent years, it has also been employed as a means of communication among microservices. RESTful APIs are used to exchange data across microservices in this technique.
Let’s have a look at some code to observe how HTTP-based communication varies from messaging-based communication in microservices:
public class OrderService {
private RestTemplate restTemplate;
public OrderService(RestTemplate restTemplate) {
this.restTemplate = restTemplate;
}
public void processOrder(Order order) {
Customer customer = restTemplate.getForObject("http://customer-service/customers/" + order.getCustomerId(), Customer.class);
// process order logic...
}
}In this example, the order microservice makes an HTTP request to the customer microservice to get customer information using a RestTemplate. The customer data is retrieved using the getForObject function, and the response is deserialized into a Customer object.
We have two microservices, a customer microservice, and an order microservice. The order microservice may get client information thanks to the customer microservice’s RESTful API.
Benefits of HTTP-Based Communication
- Simple to use: HTTP is a well-known and simple protocol. Developers may readily create RESTful APIs to expose microservices and enable communication between them.
- Statelessness: Because of its statelessness, HTTP is naturally scalable. Each request is handled individually, and no connection between the client and server is required.
- Caching: HTTP allows for caching, which is important when dealing with huge volumes of data. Microservices can reduce system load and enhance speed by caching frequently requested data.
Disadvantages of HTTP-Based Communication
- Latency: When significant volumes of data are exchanged, an HTTP-based connection might create lag. This can result in slower reaction times and reduced performance.
- Complexity: As the number of endpoints and methods rises, RESTful APIs may become complicated. This can make system maintenance and updates difficult.
- Lack of dependability: HTTP-based communication is network-dependent and can be impacted by network slowness and errors.
Communication via Messaging
A message broker is used to promote communication between microservices in messaging-based communication. Messages are routed across a queue between microservices, decoupling the sender and recipient.
We have the same two microservices in this example:
- Customer microservice
- Order microservice
The order microservice subscribes to this information once the customer microservice publishes it to a message broker.
Customer Microservice Identifier
public class CustomerService {
private MessageBroker messageBroker;
public CustomerService(MessageBroker messageBroker)
{
this.messageBroker = messageBroker;
}
public void createCustomer(Customer customer) {
// create customer logic...
messageBroker.publish("customer.created", customer);
}
}
Order Microservice Code
public class OrderService {
private MessageBroker messageBroker;
public OrderService(MessageBroker messageBroker) {
this.messageBroker = messageBroker;
this.messageBroker.subscribe("customer.created", this::processOrder);
}
private void processOrder(Customer customer) {
// process order logic...
}
}When a new customer is established, the customer microservice publishes customer information to the message broker. The order microservice uses the subscribe method to subscribe to this information, and the processOrder method is invoked whenever fresh client information is received.
Benefits of Messaging-Based Communication
- Scalability: Messaging-based communication is extremely scalable and capable of handling massive volumes of data with little delay. This makes it perfect for high-throughput applications.
- Dependability: Because of the employment of a message broker, messaging-based communication is extremely dependable. Communications are queued until they are properly processed, reducing the chance of data loss.
- Adaptability: Messaging-based communication is adaptable and can handle a broad range of data forms, including binary data. As a result, it is appropriate for applications that work with complicated data structures.
Disadvantages of Messaging-Based Communication
- Complexity: Messaging-based communication can be difficult to set up and manage, especially when numerous message brokers are involved.
- Protocol support is limited: Messaging-based communication is frequently restricted to a few protocols, such as AMQP or MQTT. This can make integration with other systems that utilize other protocols problematic.
- Lack of standardization: There is presently no common message protocol for microservices communication, making interoperability between various systems problematic.
As in the examples, there are substantial differences between HTTP-based and messaging-based communication in microservices. HTTP-based communication is straightforward and quick to use, but as the number of endpoints and methods grows, it can create delay and complexity.
Although messaging-based communication is incredibly scalable and reliable, it is more complicated to set up and operate. Eventually, the choice between these two approaches is dictated by the application’s specific requirements.
Conclusion
HTTP and messaging have their advantages and disadvantages for microservices communication. HTTP is a more straightforward and well-established protocol, making it easier to implement and integrate with existing infrastructure. It also offers better compatibility with load balancers and proxies, making it a good choice for systems that require high availability and scalability.
On the other hand, messaging provides a more robust and flexible communication mechanism for microservices. It allows for asynchronous and decoupled communication, which can be beneficial for systems that require loose coupling and event-driven architectures.
Messaging also supports different patterns such as publish/subscribe, which can help to reduce complexity and improve scalability.
Ultimately, the choice between HTTP and messaging will depend on the specific requirements of the microservices architecture. Teams should carefully consider factors, such as scalability, flexibility, and compatibility, when deciding on a communication protocol.
In many cases, a hybrid approach that combines the strengths of HTTP and messaging may be the most effective solution.
